<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Planning on GeekyRyan</title><link>https://rnemeth90.github.io/tags/planning/</link><description>Recent content in Planning on GeekyRyan</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://rnemeth90.github.io/tags/planning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Building an Operational Strategy for Understanding and Responding to Alerts</title><link>https://rnemeth90.github.io/projects/2024-09-05-operational-alerting-strategy/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://rnemeth90.github.io/projects/2024-09-05-operational-alerting-strategy/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;You can have all the alerts configured you want, but if the team doesn&amp;rsquo;t agree on what they mean, who&amp;rsquo;s responsible for them, and what a good response looks like, they&amp;rsquo;re just noise. This was about building that operational strategy - making sure every alert had a clear owner, a documented playbook, and an agreed severity/escalation path.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s the human side of alerting, not the technical side. Once you&amp;rsquo;ve got the right metrics feeding into alerts, you need the operational discipline to make sure those alerts actually get owned and responded to consistently, whoever&amp;rsquo;s on call.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Developing a Plan for SLA Reporting and Shipping Version 1</title><link>https://rnemeth90.github.io/projects/2024-09-05-sla-reporting-plan/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://rnemeth90.github.io/projects/2024-09-05-sla-reporting-plan/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;SLAs don&amp;rsquo;t mean much if you can&amp;rsquo;t actually measure and report on them. This project was about figuring out what metrics mattered for our SLA commitments, finding where that data lives, and building a v1 reporting system so stakeholders could see how we were actually tracking.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I wasn&amp;rsquo;t trying to solve everything on day one - just get a credible baseline in front of people and iterate from there. That&amp;rsquo;s usually the right approach for reporting work anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Developing and Documenting a Disaster Recovery Plan</title><link>https://rnemeth90.github.io/projects/2024-08-28-developing-a-disaster-recovery-plan/</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://rnemeth90.github.io/projects/2024-08-28-developing-a-disaster-recovery-plan/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;DR plans usually exist in people&amp;rsquo;s heads until you actually need one - at which point tribal knowledge doesn&amp;rsquo;t cut it. Time to actually write one down.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Turn the ad hoc recovery knowledge into a structured plan: recovery point/time objectives, failover procedures, who does what during an incident. A document so someone who wasn&amp;rsquo;t in the room when the environment was built can still execute a recovery under pressure.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The plan becomes the runbook you actually use during the DR exercises, so it pays for itself immediately.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>